Sox and Drugs: Baseball, Steroids and Physics

Speaker:

Roger G. Tobin, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University

Date & Time:

September 24, 2008 - 4:45pm

Location:

Physics Lecture Hall

"Sox and Drugs: Baseball, Steroids and Physics" Physics and Astronomy
Physics & Astronomy Colloquium, 4:45 p.m. Physics Lecture Hall Roger G. Tobin, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University The sports world is in an uproar over performance-enhancing drugs. In the United States steroids in baseball have received the most attention, in part because the purported effects are much more dramatic than in any other sport. From 1995-2003 a few players hit home runs at rates 20-50% higher than the best sluggers of the preceding century. In other sports where steroid use has been widespread, such as track and field, the enhancements have been much more modest. Could steroids really increase home-run performance that much? I will describe a model that combines estimates of the physiological effects of steroids, known baseball physics, and reasonable models of batting effectiveness for highly skilled hitters. A 10% increase in muscle mass, which can reasonably be expected from steroid use, increases the speed of a batted ball by 3%. But because home runs are relatively rare events on the tail of a batter’s range distribution, even this modest change in speed can increase the proportion of batted balls that result in home runs by 30 – 70% ‑ enough to account for the record-shattering performances of the recent past. I will also describe some of the attention – both welcome and not – that comes to the unsuspecting physicist who wades into such emotionally troubled waters.

"Sox and Drugs: Baseball, Steroids and Physics"
Physics and Astronomy

Physics & Astronomy Colloquium, 4:45 p.m. Physics Lecture Hall
Roger G. Tobin, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University

The sports world is in an uproar over performance-enhancing drugs. In the United States steroids in baseball have received the most attention, in part because the purported effects are much more dramatic than in any other sport. From 1995-2003 a few players hit home runs at rates 20-50% higher than the best sluggers of the preceding century. In other sports where steroid use has been widespread, such as track and field, the enhancements have been much more modest. Could steroids really increase home-run performance that much?

I will describe a model that combines estimates of the physiological effects of steroids, known baseball physics, and reasonable models of batting effectiveness for highly skilled hitters. A 10% increase in muscle mass, which can reasonably be expected from steroid use, increases the speed of a batted ball by 3%. But because home runs are relatively rare events on the tail of a batter’s range distribution, even this modest change in speed can increase the proportion of batted balls that result in home runs by 30 – 70% ‑ enough to account for the record-shattering performances of the recent past.

I will also describe some of the attention – both welcome and not – that comes to the unsuspecting physicist who wades into such emotionally troubled waters.

Giving to IAMDN

Sox and Drugs: Baseball, Steroids and Physics